3GPP TS V () Technical Specification 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Net. C_REC#3: The cellular host must comply with the behavior defined in [TS] [TS] [TS] for requesting a PDP- Context type. File Name: pycrate_mobile/ # * Created: 3GPP TS Mobile radio interface layer 3 specification. # release 13 (d90).
|Published (Last):||8 January 2018|
|PDF File Size:||20.38 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||20.12 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Network elements will also need to be dual-stack capable in order to support the dual-stack deployment model. Both authentication and integrity protection are performed during call processing operations. Both dual- stack and IPv6-only deployment models are considered.
IPv6 in 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) Evolved Packet System (EPS)
The authentication, location update, and 3gp; data acquisition procedures all use the serving PLMN. A shared network including eNodeBs and MMEs is set up by an operator and shared with other operators. Legacy devices and hosts that have an IPv4-only stack will continue to be provided with IP connectivity to the Internet and services. This document is organized as follows: Note, this profile does not require IPv4 service continuity techniques listed in Section 4.
Services with IP flows requiring different packet-forwarding treatment would therefore require more than one EPS bearer. As a result, the IPv4 address assigned to a UE within the context of a single operator realm would no longer be unique. Other ROHC profiles may be supported.
In some cases, a network can specify an. However, without comprehensive testing of current widely used applications and solutions for their ability to operate over IPv6 PDN connections, an IPv6-only access would cause disruptions. This information element contains only the Interface Identifier of the IPv6 address. Therefore, multi-homing within a single bearer is not possible. RFC IPv6 Profile for Cellular Devices May Some of the features listed in this profile document could require that dedicated functions be activated at the network side.
Binet Request for Comments: Contreras Murillo, and M. The recommendations do not include 3GPP release details. Authentication, Integrity Protection and Ciphering is performed during call processing operations. It is up to a specific deployment whether address translation is part of the network or not.
The UE IP stack has to take this into consideration. This section discusses a few additional security concerns to take into consideration. This feature is optional and requires a license. This is a major concern against providing dual-stack connectivity using techniques discussed in Section 6. In the context of NAT64, IPv6-enabled applications relying on address referrals will fail because an IPv6-only client will not be able to make use of an IPv4 address received in a referral.
The eNodeBs must support network sharing. During authentication, both the UE and the network confirm that the other is valid by a series of computations based on a shared secret Authentication Key K. You could perhaps use deep-packet inspection to search out 2. No security procedures are performed during call processing operations.
It does not require additional protocol to be supported by the cellular host and it is already deployed in IPv4 cellular networks to convey such DNS information. The functional split of gateways allows operators to choose optimized topological locations of nodes within the network and enables various deployment models, including the sharing of radio networks between different operators. The deferred address allocation is based on the use of DHCPv4 as well as appropriate UE-side implementation- dependent triggers to invoke the protocol.
DHCPv6 The purpose of this recommendation is to guarantee for a deterministic behavior to be followed by all cellular hosts when the DNS information is received in various channels. Chen China Mobile N. The number of UEs that a gateway supports is on the order of 1 to 10 million. With subscriber growth projected to increase even further, and with recent depletion of available IPv4 address space by IANA, 3GPP operators and vendors are now in the process of identifying the scenarios and solutions needed to deploy IPv6.
hjp: doc: RFC An IPv6 Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices
Michaud Rogers Communications D. Its length is 6 digits. The control plane is always at least integrity and replay Korhonen, et al. The UE is allowed to use any Interface Identifier it wishes for the other addresses it configures. The inter-operator roaming network itself is also completely separated from the Internet. The control-plane traffic always goes through the SGSN. In particular, it bears repeating here that the true impact of stateful filtering may be a reduction in security and that the IETF makes no statement, expressed or implied, as to whether using the capabilities described in any of these documents ultimately improves security for any individual users or for the Internet community as a whole.
This is also a contribution to harmonize operators’ requirements towards device vendors. Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at http: The cellular host must be able to generate IPv6 addresses that preserve privacy.
heise Netze – IPv6 in 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) Evolved Packet System (EPS)
The objectives of this effort are as follows: CLAT may not be required in some contexts, e. Ensuring IPv6 feature parity among these interface types is important for the sake of specification efficiency, service design simplification, and validation effort optimization. This has a few known issues, especially when the IP stack is made to believe that the underlying link has link-layer addresses.